Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

young
A while ago, I got into an accidental conversation with Werthead about story endings. We both agreed they were important, but I couldn't figure out why they mattered so very much. After all, if I fly through four hundred pages of joy, why should one final chapter render the whole experience pointless? And yet it often does. I'll tell everybody to stay away from a book with a crappy ending and not to waste their time like I did, with my three happy days of excitement, followed by a mere hour of disappointment. It just doesn't make sense. Except when we take into account the way human beings experience time. Insert spooky music.

 

Don't worry, I haven't really done any scientific studies. I haven't done any research at all. So everything that follows is the result of lazy conjecture and nothing more.

 

Just think of all those fond memories you have of that favourite aunty of yours. The sweets she gave you and the cuddles the time your cats disappeared. Her disappointment for you when your first love ran away from home and never asked you to come along, never even sent a note. Oh, she was the one you always went to with your problems; the rosy cheeked confidante who kept all your plans and dreams to herself and never told another soul... Those times are precious to you -- never to be forgotten, your most treasured possessions that you can take out and hug close any time you feel lonely.

 

And then one day, the police arrive at her house. They excavate the horrific remains from her basement. At first, it's just the brutalised bones of tortured kittens. Then, they call in the Dublin CSI squad as they find the dessicated corpse of a missing person. Your heart freezes in your chest as the murder victim's name is released. Now you know why you never got any letters from Capital City. I guess your aunty just didn't want to share you.

 

And how do you feel about those memories after that? Can you think of the kittens without remembering their smashed bones? Does your skin crawl when you visualise that woman hugging you while your love lay bound and gagged in the dripping cellar, bare metres below? It's become poison in the end and all the wonderful years that preceded it can only make it worse.

 

Stories are linear when we're reading them, but once they're complete, they become accessible to us in their entirety. Often, not knowing the ending is what provides a large portion of our reading enjoyment. Or is 'enjoyment' even the right word?


You have your nose planted between the pages. The Nork asks if you're enjoying your book, and you might say 'yes'. But maybe it's not enjoyment you feel, but excitement. Is there a difference? I'd say so. I'd say that excitement is 'deferred enjoyment'. It's like placing a bet on a race. The larger the stake, the greater the payoff if you win or disappointment if you lose.

 

In memory, excitement is replaced by warm echoes of the payoff. The secrets of the plot are gone and we are left only with our admiration for a job well done. The book has changed from a series of events to a single atomic entity where the payoff or lack of one casts its shadow over all the rest. Shroedinger's book has finally been opened and we know already if the Stark has lived or died.


Many of us have recently read Joe Abercrombie's "First Law" trilogy. I can't speak for anybody else, but while I enjoyed each of the books, at the back of my mind there was always a doubt: "you're only pretending to be a cynical SOB. At the end, you're going to betray me like all the others with an orgy of tearful, happy weddings while bad guys grind their teeth from the bottom table." Luckily, I was not disappointed. That's one aunty whose basement will never need excavation.

 

But of course, the subject of endings is far, far more complex than I've painted it. For example, even if George R. R. Martin were to fail in bringing his epic series to an amazing conclusion, there are certain things he has done, certain moments, that nothing can poison in my memory. No reader who has ever lived through the Red Wedding, or been introduced to Tyrion can feel short changed. Maybe that's because such moments represent sufficient payoffs in their own right that can weather any later storms. Or maybe my memory of them may change in the light of "A Dance with Dragons".

 

So, I'll have to come back to this one after a bit more musing.

 

NEWS

 

Yet another great review for librarians, but Irish ones this time, rather than their American cousins. The books magazine, Inis, said: "Ó Guilín is a skilled writer and storyteller and the narrative is enthralling. [...] The Inferior is thought-provoking, well-written and enjoyable. It will appeal to fans of science fiction, horror and fantasy, although readers of a sensitive disposition should beware."

 

 

Comments

[info]keithdouglas wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 10:32 am (UTC)
The magic of aname
Congratulations on the good review review.

Where would you suggest I start with George R. R. Martin?
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 10:35 am (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
A Game of Thrones is the book... It takes a while to realise how special it is, but once you do, you'll want to book a few weeks off to finish the rest of them :)
[info]the_corbie wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 12:47 pm (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
Yeah, AGOT is probably the easiest place to start, in terms of being a) easily available, b) his major work and c) bloody well written.

I'd suggest also 'Dying of the Light', if you see it, because I *loved* it: or one of the short story collections, because until ASOIAF that was really George's forte. Besides, shorts are an excellent way to get to know new writers (I find).
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 12:48 pm (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
Yeah, "The Dreamsongs" monster short story collection is excellent.
[info]keithdouglas wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 01:03 pm (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
Thanks Iain,

Out of interest what did you think of River of Gods?
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 01:06 pm (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
I'm not Iain, but I liked it a lot. Brazyl is pretty cool too. Maybe better.
[info]the_corbie wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 02:10 pm (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
I loved it, and am reading Brasyl just now. Highly recommended - I thought the characters were excellent, and the background too.
[info]niamhotoole wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 04:10 pm (UTC)
Re: The magic of aname
I hated dying of the light. Never recommend controversial personal favourites.
If I had read that thing first, I'd have never ever touched the others.
[info]ebenstone wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 11:32 am (UTC)
When does the book come out here in the States? I'm going to have to get my wife to lift the book-buying embargo to get it, but I read a sample chapter and LOVED it dude!
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 11:49 am (UTC)
Thanks a lot, Ebenstone. It comes out in the States on June 10. Please tell your wife she's the best person in the world and that her flexibility and good taste do her credit ;-)
[info]jamesenge wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 02:01 pm (UTC)
"excitement is 'deferred enjoyment'"

The whole entry is great, but this observation is particularly crunchy.
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 02:22 pm (UTC)
Don't you go breaking no teeth, now.
[info]xraytheenforcer wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 03:37 pm (UTC)
I'm feeling far too glib today to properly respond to this post. Awesome post, though. :)
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 04:50 pm (UTC)
Thanks, oh glibness :)
[info]ildrinn wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 03:37 pm (UTC)
Ansen Dibell had a nice metaphor for how bad endings can ruin a story. Imagine you're eating a delicious apple. Then, with your last bite, you spot half a worm left in the core...
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 04:50 pm (UTC)
That's it exactly. Except that some people like the worm part best :-)
[info]niamhotoole wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 04:12 pm (UTC)
Great post.
You're wasted on young adults (btw why is the outgrown children crowd called young adult? nothing adult about any of them)
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 04:59 pm (UTC)
Oh, never wasted! Thanks, mucho for the compliment, although I think you're being a bit harsh about YAs. It's a difficult, exciting time of life. I think that's why I so often end up writing about that age group. I never left it myself.
[info]niamhotoole wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 05:41 pm (UTC)
Harsh is me.
[info]werthead wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 05:32 pm (UTC)
The most notable example of a sucky ending torpedoing the entire series up to that point is Memory, Sorrow & Thorn by Tad Williams. Williams wanted to write a 'revisionist Tolkien' which avoided some of the 'problems' in LotR. Y'know, he had stronger female characters, had no casual racism etc (although the 'racism' in Tolkien is a highly debatable matter in itself). So at the end of MS&T, after over 2,500 pages of reasonably well-written epic fantasy, he gave us the single most corncheese, even-Eddings-wouldn't-haven-been-that-cliched ending I have ever seen to a fantasy novel. It maade me want to hurl the final book (1,100 pages in hardcover) through the window.

I do want to go back and reread the series, but the thought of that ending really winds me up.
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 2nd, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC)
I can feel the anger burning through my screen here! I don't remember it being that bad. But then, I don't remember it at all.
[info]bondo_ba wrote:
Apr. 3rd, 2008 01:33 am (UTC)
Congrats on the review... And nice theory on the endings. However, regardless of his achievements, I'd HATE to be in GRRM's shoes. After breaking all that ground, how do you make the ending memorable. Will he kill EVERYONE?
[info]peadarog wrote:
Apr. 3rd, 2008 07:26 am (UTC)
I wouldn't want to speculate on what he'll do! But he doesn't have to make it memorable, he *just* has to make it feel right. Of course, the problem with that is his huge cast, each with their own story in need of a satisfying conclusion.

Difficult as hell. But having read Dreamsongs, I believe that if anybody can do it, he can.